MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409912401 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.2473

OR16-02 Single-cell dissection of Obesity Identifies Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition to promote cancer progression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2024· article· en· W4409912401 on OpenAlexaff
Xi Xu, Shalini Bahl, Mathieu Lupien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionTriple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerMedicineCancer researchTransition (genetics)OncologyMesenchymal stem cellInternal medicinePathologyBiologyGeneMetastasisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract X. Xu: None. S. Bahl: None. M. Lupien: None. Overweight and obesity are known to have an adverse impact on the metastasis-free survival of individuals with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (1). However, since the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, there is an unmet need for specific treatment regimens for obese patients with TNBC. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is a pathway that plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, spanning from tumor initiation to metastasis (2). Despite its significance, limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between obesity and EMT in TNBC.Obesity has been shown to expedite and exacerbate metastatic progression in breast cancer, as supported by animal models that induce cancer stem-like signatures (3). Moreover, EMT-associated transcription factors (TFs) are significantly enriched in breast cancer stem cells (4). These TFs induce EMT properties by binding to various components of the epigenetic and transcriptional machinery. However, conducting a comprehensive investigation of EMT-associated TFs, their correlations with activating pathways, downstream targets, and their effects on crucial cancer-related processes has been hindered by the heterogeneity of tumor samples. This heterogeneity is influenced by various cell types in the tumor microenvironment play a role in interacting with cancer cells(5).To explore EMT triggers and regulatory mechanisms influenced by obesity (6), we categorized TNBC patients (T2N0M0) without any neoadjuvant therapy before surgery samples as obese or BMI-matched lean counterparts and conducted single nucleus multiome analysis to address tumor heterogeneity. Our results indicate that obese patients harbor a cancer cell state enriched with EMT-related pathways, whereas lean patients exhibit lower activity in these pathways. Furthermore, in vitro models of TNBC induced to mimic obesity through fatty acid exposure demonstrated higher migration abilities than control groups, without altering proliferation. Three differentially expressed genes (ARID4B, SMURF1, CTNNB1) were identified from the hallmark TGF-BETA-SIGNALING pathway, a classical pathway involved in EMT. These genes were negatively associated with worse survival in TNBC patients (7). Ongoing efforts aim to elucidate the underlying regulatory mechanisms governing the overexpression of EMT-associated genes. This knowledge holds potential for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches tailored to obese TNBC patients for the precision therapy.(1) Picon-Ruiz, et al,2017,CA Cancer J. Clin (2) Marc P. Stemmler,et al,2019, Nature Cell Biology (3) Mélanie Bousquenaud,et al,2018, Breast Cancer Research (4) Dongre, A, and Weinberg, R.A,et al,2019, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol (5) Alison E. Ringel, et al,2020,Cell (6)Ayse Bassez,et al,2021,Nature Medicine (7) Yuna Landais,et al,2023,Nature Communication Monday, June 3, 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207