MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409914295 · doi:10.1139/as-2024-0084

Assessing the potential for Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) colonization of Nunavik’s Arctic and subarctic rivers by 2070–2100

2025· article· en· W4409914295 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
André St‐Hilaire, Claudine Boyer, Normand Bergeron

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmoSubarctic climateArcticFisheryColonizationThe arcticGeographyEnvironmental scienceOceanographyFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Nunavik, Québec, Canada, Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) populations reach their northern limit in four rivers of southern Ungava Bay. With projected river warming from climate change, this study assesses the potential for Atlantic salmon to colonize new rivers in Nunavik by modelling water temperatures and evaluating river accessibility. Migration barriers were identified with a literature review, topographic data, and satellite imagery. Water temperatures were modelled with a generalized additive model using ERA5-Land air temperature, observed daily mean temperatures, and water surface temperature estimated from Landsat imagery. Our projections indicate an average increase of the rivers mean summer temperatures of 1.2–2.7 °C by the end of the century, enhancing thermal conditions in current salmon rivers with more days with optimal growth temperatures (16–20 °C) while still having limited days with thermal stress (&gt;22 °C). By 2100, other Ungava Bay rivers may be colonized, as most are accessible and expected to reach more suitable temperatures. However, Nunavik’s northernmost rivers would remain too cold and colonization of the Hudson Bay watershed appears less likely due to the inaccessibility of most rivers and their distance from established anadromous populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207