MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409915647 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.116803

Thermal modeling of a subterranean battery energy storage system for residential and commercial buildings

2025· article· en· W4409915647 on OpenAlexafffund
Elizabeth Oyekola, Lukas G. Swan, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsBecton Dickinson (Canada)Dalhousie University
FundersDalhousie UniversityRyerson UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringThermal energy storageBattery (electricity)Environmental scienceEnergy storageEngineeringCivil engineeringAutomotive engineeringEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Battery systems are now routinely deployed at residential and commercial buildings to manage solar photovoltaic generation and electricity demand peaks. The siting of the battery is an important consideration for safety, thermal management, and size (footprint; physical presence). Subterranean (underground) installations have yet to be considered in detail, although they offer benefits in terms of these three considerations. We develop a subterranean battery finite element analysis model to investigate the thermal behaviour and energy performance. The model is calibrated and verified by comparison to experimental testing. The model is then used to investigate performance of the battery while subject to a range of use case application signals, soil thermal conditions, geographic region (soil temperature), and battery geometry. The model can be used to identify the impact of climatic conditions, shape choices, and restrictions on cycling operations due to temperature limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy StorageSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207