MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409917128 · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3565246

A Threshold-Based Stator Inter-Turn Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors Using the Negative Sequence Current’s Magnitude and Phase Angle

2025· article· en· W4409917128 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammadhossein Nazemi, Xiaodong Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsStatorInduction motorMagnitude (astronomy)Turn (biochemistry)Current (fluid)Control theory (sociology)Phase (matter)Fault (geology)Phase angle (astronomy)PhysicsEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringVoltageNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel threshold-based stator inter-turn fault (SITF) detection and faulty phase identification method for induction motors through the negative sequence stator current analysis, where the negative sequence current magnitude level (NCL) is used for SITF detection, and the negative sequence current’s phase angle (∡12) is used for the faulty phase identification. Through the systematic experimental investigation of NCL’s behavior under various unbalanced voltage conditions (0.1% to 1.7%), a detection threshold (ThSITF) of NCL equal to 10% is established. Three angular zones for ∡12 are defined for the faulty phase identification: ±60° for Phase A, 60°−180° for Phase B, and 180°−300° for Phase C. Experimental validations on a 2.2 kW induction motor demonstrates accurate SITFs detection across different fault severities and motor loading levels using the proposed method. Extensive testing results for six SITFs with 2, 3, 5, 10, 13, and 15 shorted turns at Phase B reveal a linear correlation between the fault severity and NCL. The proposed method remains effective for variable frequency drive (VFD)-fed induction motors, showing enhanced sensitivities at a higher frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207