From mechanism to medicine: The progress and potential of epigenetics in osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative disease of the articular joints. The disease presents an enormous clinical and economic burden globally, due in part to the lack of disease modifying therapies. For over a decade, OA researchers have been working to determine epigenetic mechanisms underlying the disease to better understand pathology, identify biomarkers of progression, and pinpoint novel targets for therapeutic intervention. Design: This article presents a summary of the 3rd International Workshop on the Epigenetics of Osteoarthritis held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in September 2024. The purpose of this meeting was to gather the international community to discuss the status of OA epigenetic research and share expertise on innovative techniques for future. Results: Since the two previous meetings, there has been increasing adoption of advanced single-cell and spatial sequencing technologies and bioinfomatic analyses. Furthermore, investigations of multiple joint tissues has highlighted the shifting paradigm from OA as a cartilage centric disease to the consideration of all joint tissues. Conclusions: The workshop provided a unique opportunity for early-career researchers to expand their network, and for all participants to discuss new or improved approaches to advance the field, including international consortia and data sharing. The highlights and outcomes from this OA epigenetics workshop are described in this report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".