International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2023). Plain language - Part 1 : Governing principles and guidelines. Norme ISO 24495-1:2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La norme internationale sur le langage clair (ci-après « la norme ISO ») établit les lignes directrices de la communication écrite. Bien que la norme ISO ne soit disponible qu’en anglais actuellement, les principes qui y sont mentionnés se veulent universels et ils font l’objet d’un consensus. Appuyé par des données empiriques, le travail des experts impliqués a permis la création d’une norme plutôt concise. Puisque le travail du comité d’experts se base sur des données empiriques, nous nous sommes demandée si le contenu de la norme intégrait les connaissances rédactologiques actuelles. Si tel est le cas, nous verrons si la norme peut servir de fondement à l’enseignement de la rédactologie. Cet article se veut une recension de la norme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".