MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409936373 · doi:10.3390/electronics14091814

A Graphene Nanoribbon Electrode-Based Porphyrin Molecular Device for DNA Sequencing

2025· article· en· W4409936373 on OpenAlexaff
Yongkang Li, Liping Zhou, Xue‐Feng Wang, Panagiotis Vasilopoulos, Wen‐Long You, Yushen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGraphenePorphyrinMaterials scienceElectrodeDNA sequencingOptoelectronicsDNANanotechnologyChemistryGeneticsBiologyPhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a DNA nucleobase sequencing device composed of zigzag graphene nanoribbon electrodes connected with a porphyrin molecule via carbon chains (GEPM). The connecting geometry between the nanoribbons with an even width number and the carbon chains is laterally symmetric to filter out electrons of specific modes. Various properties of the GEPM and of the GEPM + nucleobase systems, such as interaction energies, charge density differences, spin-differential electronic densities, and electric currents, are investigated using the density functional theory (DFT) combined with the non-equilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) method. The results show that the GEPM device holds promise for DNA sequencing with the measurement of the electric signals through it. The four nucleobases—adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T)—can be efficiently distinguished based on the conductance and current sensitivity when they are located on the porphyrin molecule of the GEPM device. The symmetry of the connecting geometry between the carbon chains and the nanoribbons selects Bloch states with specific symmetry to pass through the device and results in broad transmission valleys or gaps. In addition, the edge magnetism of graphene nanoribbons can further manipulate the transmission and then the sequencing effects. The device exhibits extremely high conductance sensitivity in the parallel magnetic configuration. This study explores the possible advantage of this technology compared with conventional nanopore sequencing devices and potentially expands the variety of available sequencing structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207