The Impact of a Prolonged Multivitamin Shortage on Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Case Reports of Wernicke’s Encephalopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Shortages in parenteral nutrition (PN) micronutrient components can lead to deficiencies in patients heavily relying on home PN (HPN) to meet nutritional requirements. Despite monitoring, this can cause severe and even life-threatening conditions if intravenous (IV) micronutrients are not available for a prolonged period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effect of an IV multivitamin shortage that occurred between December 2022 and July 2023. The study included patients at high risk for multivitamin deficiencies who received HPN for at least 5 days. Patients were classified into two groups: those compliant with instructions to take additional oral multivitamin supplements to compensate for the shortage and those who were not compliant. Monitoring included tracking symptoms and routine bloodwork, which measured certain vitamins, excluding thiamine. Results: A total of 25 HPN patients were identified. Among them, 56% (n = 14) were compliant with daily oral multivitamin supplementation. No significant differences in pre- and post-shortage bloodwork were observed, but there was a significant difference in bicarbonate changes between the compliant and non-compliant groups (0 (−0.9, 1) vs. −2 (−8, −1), p = 0.04, respectively). Approximately 68% of all patients reported new symptoms during the shortage, but no significant difference was observed between groups. Three patients known to have increased gastrointestinal losses (two compliant and one non-compliant) required hospitalization: two had Wernicke’s encephalopathy reversed with thiamine infusion. Conclusions: When IV multivitamins are unavailable for an extended period, at-risk patients need to be closely monitored by the HPN team, particularly for compliance to oral supplementation and for symptoms of thiamine deficiency when blood level monitoring is not feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".