MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409947795 · doi:10.1007/s12035-025-04996-1

Genome-Wide Association Study of Glucocerebrosidase Activity Modifiers

2025· article· en· W4409947795 on OpenAlexafffund
Emma N. Somerville, Lynne Krohn, Konstantin Senkevich, Eric Yu, Jamil Ahmad, Farnaz Asayesh, Jennifer A. Ruskey, Dan Spiegelman, Stanley Fahn, Cheryl Waters, S. Pablo Sardi, Roy N. Alcalay, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Neurobiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementMcGill UniversityNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsGlucocerebrosidaseParkinson's diseaseCohortSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenome-wide association studyBiologyGeneticsGenetic associationDiseaseInternal medicineMedicineOncologyGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most common genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease (PD) is variants in GBA1, which encodes the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase). GCase deficiency has been associated with an increased PD risk, but not all individuals with low GCase activity are carriers of GBA1 mutations, suggesting other factors may be acting as modifiers. We aimed to discover common variants associated with GCase activity, as well as replicate previously reported associations, by performing a genome-wide association study using two independent cohorts: a Columbia University cohort consisting of 697 PD cases and 347 controls and the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort consisting of 357 PD cases and 163 controls. As expected, GBA1 variants have the strongest association with decreased activity, led by N370S (beta = - 4.36, se = 0.32, p = 5.05e - 43). We also identify a novel association in the GAA locus (encoding for acid alpha-glucosidase, beta = - 0.96, se = 0.17, p = 5.23e - 09) that may be the result of an interaction between GCase and acid alpha-glucosidase based on various interaction analyses. Lastly, we show that several PD-risk loci are potentially associated with GCase activity. Further research will be needed to replicate and validate our findings and to uncover the functional connection between acid alpha-glucosidase and GCase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular NeurobiologySame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207