MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Water Quality on Jordanian Public Health Status: A Case Study in Zarqa Basin

2025· article· en· W4409952498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad Albrmawi, Ashraf Khashroum, Hani J. Hamad, Shamaail Saewan, Hadeel Obeidat

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityPublic healthStructural basinEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementForestryGeographyGeologyMedicineNursingGeomorphologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change significantly impacts water quality, posing serious risks to public health. Rising global temperatures and altered precipitation patterns contribute to water pollution, increasing the proliferation of harmful microorganisms and contaminants. This study examines the effects of climate change on water quality in the Zarqa Basin, Jordan, by analyzing key water quality indicators, including microbiological contamination and chemical composition. Water samples were collected and assessed for compliance with Jordanian and WHO water standards. The study followed a descriptive analytical approach, incorporating field sampling and laboratory analysis to determine the concentrations of minerals, organic matter, pesticides, and microbiological indicators. Results indicate that climate change has exacerbated water contamination, particularly through increased bacterial presence, higher turbidity, and deviations in chemical composition beyond permissible limits. The presence of Escherichia coli and total coliforms in water samples suggests heightened risks of waterborne diseases, necessitating urgent mitigation measures. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, water managers, and public health authorities in addressing climate-induced water quality challenges in Jordan and similar regions. Water samples from key locations—including Zarqa, Jerash, and King Talal Dam—were analyzed to assess their compliance with international water safety standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Health Canada, the European Union, and Australia’s National Medical and Health Research Council. Results indicate that 55.1% of the 49 assessed water quality components exceeded safe limits, highlighting substantial contamination. High concentrations of sodium, chloride, nitrogen compounds, and microbiological contaminants, particularly Escherichia coli and total coliform bacteria, were detected, posing severe health risks. Elevated pollutant levels were attributed to climate-induced changes in precipitation patterns, industrial and agricultural runoff, and insufficient wastewater treatment. Additionally, significant fluctuations in pH, water temperature, and electrical conductivity suggest instability in water quality, necessitating continuous monitoring. The study underscores the urgent need for adaptive water management strategies, regular surveillance of water quality, and policy interventions to mitigate contamination risks. Key recommendations include enhancing water purification systems, improving wastewater treatment infrastructure, and promoting community awareness about water conservation. Addressing these challenges is crucial for ensuring sustainable access to safe water in the Zarqa Basin and similar vulnerable regions. The findings emphasize the critical need for adaptive water management strategies, improved monitoring systems, and policy interventions to ensure water safety. Reducing contamination, securing alternative water resources, and implementing sustainable land-use practices are essential to protecting public health and the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207