MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409952582 · doi:10.1080/14796708.2025.2494981

The role of the gut microbiome in Parkinson’s disease

2025· article· en· W4409952582 on OpenAlexafffund
Avril Metcalfe‐Roach, B. Brett Finlay

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWeston Family Foundation
KeywordsMicrobiomeGut microbiomeDiseaseParkinson's diseaseNeuroscienceMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryBioinformaticsBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that is best characterized by motor impairment. Gut-related symptoms are prevalent in PD, including dysbiosis of the microbiome, which is relatively consistent across cohorts. Anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers are less abundant, while PD-associated taxa perform a variety of pro-inflammatory functions including LPS production and protein fermentation. Microbial metabolism of sulfur, bile acids (BAs), and neurotransmitters – particularly glutamate – may also disrupt homeostatic balance, spurring PD pathology. Together, microbial mechanisms likely promote a subset of PD cases by disrupting the gut barrier, activating the immune system, and increasing the systemic spread of microbial metabolites which trigger inflammation. Certain PD symptoms are associated with gut-first PD, and may be useful for building PD cohorts where the microbiome is more likely to be a relevant factor. The oral PD microbiome, though relatively understudied, may also promote PD through inflammatory mechanisms. Gut microbial interventions have provided some causal evidence for microbial involvement in PD, but existing studies are few and difficult to compare. Future PD microbiome studies will benefit from a personalized medicine approach, taking symptom presentation, medications, and multi-omics data into account and using standardized methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207