Successful dupilumab treatment in a patient with severe dermatitis following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the optimal treatment of hematologic diseases and various malignancies. Development of allergic disease in a transplant patient has been reported. CASE PRESENTATIONS: A 49-year-old male with no history of atopy underwent two allogenic HSCTs for aplastic anemia from his brother with severe atopic dermatitis 11 years ago. The patient developed eczema on whole body and an elevated peripheral blood eosinophil count of 5775 cells/µL at 3 months after the second HSCT. Despite prolonged treatment with systemic corticosteroids and immunomodulators the skin rash and elevated blood eosinophil count persisted. However, after 4 months of dupilumab therapy, the patient showed near-complete clearance of symptoms. The sustained clinical improvement was observed during 36 months treatment without adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, atopic dermatitis can occur after HSCT, and dupilumab may be safe and effective for refractory conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".