MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409955446 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2025.2491423

Government’s distorted communication and land grabbing in Taiwan

2025· article· fr· W4409955446 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yung­-Yu Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science and Technology CouncilMinistry of Science and Technology, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh
KeywordsLand grabbingGovernment (linguistics)BusinessPolitical scienceGeographyLinguisticsPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Land expropriation and forced eviction for development in Taiwan have led to serious social issues. The government justifies these measures as essential for growth. In our study, using Habermas’s theory, we found that residents’ lifeworld experiences differ significantly from official propaganda. We argue that the government’s pursuit of financial gain under the guise of development has created a crisis in citizens’ lifeworlds. This highlights the gap between reality and official rhetoric, stressing the need for more transparent and genuine communication on land policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207