<i>bamSliceR</i> : a Bioconductor package for rapid, cross-cohort variant and allelic bias analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivation The National Cancer Institute Genomic Data Commons (GDC) provides controlled access to sequencing data from thousands of subjects, enabling large-scale study of impactful genetic alterations such as simple and complex germline and structural variants. However, efficient analysis requires significant computational resources and expertise, especially when calling variants from raw sequence reads. To solve these problems, we developed bamSliceR, a R/bioconductor package that builds upon the GenomicDataCommons package to extract aligned sequence reads from cross-GDC meta-cohorts, followed by targeted analysis of variants and effects (including transcript-aware variant annotation from transcriptome-aligned GDC RNA data). Results Here, we demonstrate population-scale genomic and transcriptomic analyses with minimal compute burden using bamSliceR, identifying recurrent, clinically relevant sequence, and structural variants in the TARGET acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and BEAT-AML cohorts. We then validate results in the (non-GDC) Leucegene cohort, demonstrating how the bamSliceR pipeline can be seamlessly applied to replicate findings in non-GDC cohorts. These variants directly yield clinically impactful and biologically testable hypotheses for mechanistic investigation. Availability and implementation bamSliceR has been submitted to the Bioconductor project, where it is presently under review, and is available on GitHub at https://github.com/trichelab/bamSliceR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.183 | 0.145 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".