MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409963331 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2025-0004

The calcium-sensitive receptor in the pathogenesis of sepsis

2025· review· en· W4409963331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bin Yu, Xuelian Li, Yang Li, Cheng Han, Jun Tan, Xiaoyan Yu, Min Li, Zhe Xu, Xiongying Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisOrgan dysfunctionPathogenesisCalcium-sensing receptorReceptorMedicineSignal transductionImmunologyBiologyBioinformaticsCalciumInternal medicineCell biologyCalcium metabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sepsis is an organ dysfunction caused by the body's dysfunctional response to infection, which is one of the most important causes of death in critically ill patients. It is characterized by high morbidity, high mortality, and high treatment costs. Currently, the treatment of sepsis relies mainly on supportive therapy, and there is a lack of targeted intervention ways. Studying the pathogenesis of sepsis and exploring new therapeutic targets are of great theoretical and clinical importance. Calcium-sensitive receptor (CaSR) is a cell membrane receptor belonging to the family of G protein-coupled receptors and is widely distributed in various tissues and organs. Research indicates that CaSR plays a role in mitigating sepsis-induced organ dysfunction, exhibiting tissue-specific protective effects in certain tissues while inducing inflammatory responses in others. Elucidating these dual effects and the underlying signaling pathways could facilitate the development of targeted therapies for sepsis-related organ damage. This review summarizes recent literature and evidence on CaSR signaling in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. In addition, we provide an up-to-date schematic of the most important and likely molecular signaling pathways associated with CaSR in sepsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→