MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409963448 · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00796

Improvement of the Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate and Combustion of Aluminum Powder by Dual Core–Shell Ammonium Perchlorate-Based Composites Based on Self-Assembly Coating

2025· article· en· W4409963448 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Gou, Xiaole Sun, Jinxiang Yang, Jiahui Shi, Xueyong Guo, Siyu Yu, Jianxin Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAmmonium perchlorateThermal decompositionMaterials scienceCoatingComposite materialCore (optical fiber)CombustionAluminiumShell (structure)Ammonium nitrateDecompositionPerchlorateChemical engineeringComposite numberChemistryOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ammonium perchlorate (AP), which is the most commonly used oxidant in composite propellants, plays a vital role in the combustion performance of propellants. In this work, by coating the AP surface with a self-assembled coating layer of gallic acid (GA) and transition metal ions (Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) and then connecting it with a 1 H,1 H,2 H,2 H -perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane (PDTS) coating layer, the AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) composite was successfully prepared. Molecular dynamics simulation calculations show that GA and AP have a good binding ability. At the same time, the binding ability of PDTS and GA is also much higher than that of PDTS and AP. In addition, the peak temperature of high-temperature decomposition and activation energy of AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) are lower than those of AP, and the heat release during the thermal decomposition process is much higher than AP. Compared with pure AP, the surface coating properties of AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) have also changed significantly. AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) can float on water; its static contact angle with the water surface is much higher than that of pure AP, and it absorbs almost no moisture after being placed in humid air for 30 days. Combustion experiments show that the burning speed and burning intensity of AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ )/Al are significantly higher than those of AP/Al, and AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ )/Al has a stronger emission spectrum. Finally, the catalytic mechanism of AP@GA-M@PDTS (M = Cu 2+ or Fe 3+ ) to improve the combustion of aluminum powder is discussed. In summary, it is a very promising solid propellant additive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicEnergetic Materials and CombustionFrench-language works237,207