MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409963642 · doi:10.1177/12034754251336197

Impact of Medical and Surgical Treatments on Quality of Life and Pain for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

2025· review· en· W4409963642 on OpenAlexaff
Grace Xiong, Muhammad Saad, Jia Bai, Eric Yu, Sana Gupta, Eric McMullen, Vincent Piguet, David Croitoru, Raed Alhusayen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of OttawaWomen's College HospitalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidradenitis suppurativaMedicineMeta-analysisQuality of life (healthcare)DermatologyMEDLINESurgeryPhysical therapyPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor, Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that can significantly affect patients' quality of life (QoL), causing pain, discomfort, and emotional distress.1,2 With emerging therapies for HS, reporting patientreported outcomes (PROs) in studies is crucial, as QoL and pain remain primary considerations in treatment selection.3 This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of current HS treatments on QoL and other PROs in observational studies.MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS were searched from inception to April 2024, using keywords related to HS and PROs.Primary literature on medical, surgical, and other treatments for HS were included (Figure S1).Study characteristics, baseline, and post-intervention PRO scores were extracted.Where data were sufficient, a randomeffects meta-analysis was conducted to determine the impact of HS treatments on QoL and pain.Results were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) for generalizability and clinical relevance.The risk of bias was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and the Cochrane risk of bias tool according to a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024542774).From 43 studies, 1763 patients (mean age: 36.7 years) with female predominance (58.1%) were identified.Most had Hurley stage II/III disease (82.6%); baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), pain Numerical Rating Scale, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores averaged 15.3/30, 6.0/10, and 5.8/10, respectively, indicating a significant QoL impairment and moderate pain (Table S1).Intralesional kenalog, resorcinol, Janus kinase inhibitors, hyperbaric oxygen, photodynamic therapy, laser, and combination treatments were analyzed descriptively (Tables S2-S8).Meta-analysis revealed a large improvement in DLQI scores for all treatments (SMD >0.8).Among medical interventions, anti-TNF-α inhibitors (SMD 1.28-1.46,95% CIs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.019
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicHidradenitis Suppurativa and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207