Pre-Treatment Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics from T2-Weighted and Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an integral part of breast cancer management, and response to NAC is an important prognostic factor associated with improved survival outcomes. However, the current standard for response assessment relies on post-surgical histopathological analysis, which limits early therapeutic decision-making and treatment personalization. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning model that integrates pre-treatment MRI radiomics and clinical features to predict response to NAC in breast cancer patients. (2) Methods: In this study, a machine learning model was developed to predict breast cancer response to NAC using pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and clinical data. Radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1) and T2-weighted (T2) MRI sequences using both intratumoral and peritumoral segmentations. Furthermore, this study uniquely examined two response assessment criteria: (1) pathologic complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR, and (2) clinical response versus non-response. A total of 254 patients with biopsy-confirmed breast cancer who completed NAC were included. Radiomic features (n = 400) and clinical features (n = 7) were analyzed to build a predictive model employing the XGBoost classifier. Performance was measured in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC. (3) Results: The integration of radiomic features with clinical data significantly enhanced the predictive performance. For pCR and non-pCR prediction, the combined features model achieved an accuracy of 80% and AUC of 0.85, outperforming both the clinical features model (Accuracy = 68%, AUC = 0.81) and radiomic features model (Accuracy = 66%, AUC = 0.60). Similarly, for the clinical response and non-response prediction, the combined features model achieved an Accuracy of 74% and AUC of 0.75, outperforming both the clinical features model (Accuracy = 63%, AUC = 0.68) and radiomic features model (Accuracy = 66%, AUC = 0.57). (4) Conclusions: These findings highlight the synergistic effect of integrating clinical data and MRI-based radiomics to improve pre-treatment NAC response prediction, which has the potential to enable more precise and personalized treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".