MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409964974 · doi:10.1177/12034754251336202

Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Management of Chondrodermatitis Nodularis Helicis: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4409964974 on OpenAlexaff
Megan Park, Bianca Te, Orhan Yilmaz, Nethmi Rajapakse, Samiha Mohsen, Ilya Mukovozov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of British ColumbiaWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor, Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a benign, inflammatory condition of the ear, typically presenting as a painful, solitary nodule on the helix or antihelix, often with scaling or crusting. 1It primarily affects individuals aged 50 to 80, though its incidence and prevalence are unclear. 2Trauma, actinic damage, cold exposure, collagen defects, and autoimmune diseases may contribute to the pathogenesis. 3This systematic review aims to provide a summary of reported cases of CNH, highlighting its clinical manifestations and therapeutic approaches.The study protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42024561941) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. 4MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception (1946) to June 25, 2024, using the keywords "chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis" OR "chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis."Case reports, series, and observational studies with CNH diagnoses were included without language or geographic restrictions.Study quality was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicDermatological and Skeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207