Interconnectedness of Stock Indices in African Economies Under Financial, Health, and Political Crises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the interconnectedness of African stock markets during three major global crises: the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. We use daily stock index data from 2007 to 2023 for ten African countries and apply a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive (TVP-VAR) model. The results reveal that volatility connectedness among African markets intensified during all three crises, peaking during the COVID-19 pandemic followed by the 2008 GFC and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Short-term connectedness consistently exceeded long-term connectedness across all crises. South Africa and Egypt acted as dominant transmitters of volatility, highlighting their systemic importance, while Morocco showed increased influence during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings suggest that African markets are more globally integrated than previously assumed, making them vulnerable to external shocks. Policy implications include the need for stronger regional financial cooperation, the development of early warning systems, and enhanced intra-African investment to improve market resilience and reduce contagion risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".