Variational Autoencoders for Completing the Volatility Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variational autoencoders (VAEs) have emerged as a promising tool for modeling volatility surfaces, with particular significance for generating synthetic implied volatility scenarios that enhance risk management capabilities. This study evaluates VAE performance using synthetic volatility surfaces, chosen specifically for their arbitrage-free properties and clean data characteristics. Through a comprehensive comparison with traditional methods including thin-plate spline interpolation, parametric models (SABR and SVI), and deterministic autoencoders, we demonstrate that our VAE approach with latent space optimization consistently outperforms existing methods, particularly in scenarios with extreme data sparsity. Our findings show that accurate, arbitrage-free surface reconstruction is achievable using only 5% of the original data points, with errors 7–12 times lower than competing approaches in high-sparsity scenarios. We rigorously validate the preservation of critical no-arbitrage conditions through probability distribution analysis and total variance strip non-intersection tests. The framework we develop overcomes traditional barriers of limited market data by generating over 13,500 synthetic surfaces for training, compared to typical market availability of fewer than 100. These capabilities have important implications for market risk analysis, derivatives pricing, and the development of more robust risk management frameworks, particularly in emerging markets or for newly introduced derivatives where historical data are scarce. Our integration of machine learning with financial theory constraints represents a significant advancement in volatility surface modeling that balances statistical accuracy with financial relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".