AI-Driven Threat Detection and Response for Healthcare: Securing Patient Data in Cloud Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several healthcare organizations have started adopting cloud services, which has led to the emergence of this issue, with patient data privacy and security being the most crucial. Current conventional security operating models are more reactive and based on rules that do not suffice in the case of new and more complex threats in large systems dealing with big data from EHRs, connected smart devices, and heavily used patient care access. This paper provides a detailed overview of threat detection and response systems in the healthcare sector through the help of a powerful Artificial Intelligence system. The system utilizes ML models trained on past intrusion data from cloud-native services such as Amazon SageMaker, AWS GuardDuty, and Macie. It performs real-time threat detection on the client’s network and responds to them effectively while adhering to HIPAA standards. Such technological components consist of Federated Learning, an advanced method of training Machine Learning models without compromising the data owner’s privacy, Behavioural Biometrics as an improved method of identification and authentications, and Blockchain technology to provide an unchanging record of events. Realizations of the framework were performed based on both artificial and real datasets of a hospital to show that it outperforms traditional systems with 97.2% average detection accuracy, 70% less false positive rates, and saved hours, whereas the meantime for threat detection was reduced to seconds. The study also discusses AI’s use in real-time compliance monitoring, eradicating compliance issues and operational expenses. There exist great prospects for the further improvement of health care information security utilizing AI as an instrument for advances in early, continuous, and scalable actualisation of patient data’s cloud; as for other considerable further studies, there are tendencies in explainable models, intelligence federation, and quantum insensitivity of information protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".