2018 - 2023. Rampa y otras mejoras en la llegada a Santiago del Camino Francés, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interventions carried out at the point where the French Pilgrims’ Way enters Santiago de Compostela. The ramp overcomes a very problematic meeting point between Monte do Gozo and the high-speed road infrastructures surrounding the city. It replaces a long and steep staircase built over the cut made by a road, which broke the continuity of the pilgrims' route, hindering accessibility and mobility for wheelchair users, cyclists and horse riders. The difference in height is 9 metres. The structure, with a gentle slope and a continuous length of about 120 metres and a width of 2.5 metres, makes it possible to stop and observe the city that appears as one descends. Its curves, twists and turns are used as transitional spaces in which one senses the transition to the urban environment, between fragments of nature that are left behind. The walker registers a change of time (arrival) and space (between the countryside and the city).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".