MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409966891 · doi:10.4995/eb.2025.23764

2017 - 2023. Reurbanización del Borde Portuario y mejora de la Playa de Porto do Son, A Coruña, España

2025· article· es· W4409966891 on OpenAlexaff
CREUSeCARRASCO

Bibliographic record

VenueEN BLANCO Revista de Arquitectura · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partimos de un espacio que ha evolucionado con el tiempo creando distancias y barreras frente al mar. Su memoria se ha perdido y existen desajustes entre los diferentes usos que en él confluyen. La ausencia de contacto distorsiona la historia del lugar y el intercambio en equilibrio entre acción de la naturaleza y actividad humana. La ocupación indiscriminada de vehículos y personas en torno al puerto impide además percibir un territorio de gran valor paisajístico. En la zona de la playa un muro y un paseo asfaltado impiden su encuentro natural con el parque. El viento, repelido frontalmente extiende la arena de forma indiscriminada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1550.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEN BLANCO Revista de ArquitecturaSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207