Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tres unidades para ocupar una parte llana del camping actual, en una zona próxima al río. Se plantean como viviendas temporales para vacaciones de unos 40 m2. La propiedad insiste en mantener su independencia de vistas, acceso y relación con el terreno, sirviendo de pauta para una ordenación que podría extenderse o trasladar a otras zonas con características similares. El diseño optimiza la construcción mediante la prefabricación y el uso, definiendo un rectángulo de 5x8 metros dividido por un eje central de acceso de 1,8 que es vestíbulo y cocina. Este espacio es una parte del camino de acceso a cada uno. Se cubre y desdibuja su interior-exterior mediante losas de suelo que se extienden como terrazas, carpinterías de vidrio y lucernario. A ambos lados se articulan dos piezas de estancia que son anillos de hormigón. Una, al oeste, contiene el salón-comedor-dormitorio, abierto al espacio central mediante correderas. La otra, al este, dormitorio principal y baño.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.424 | 0.206 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".