Military Tradition and Identity in the Ancient Culture of Ukraine: A Cultural-Semantic Dimension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to identify and analyse the genesis of the formation of military tradition and military identity in the culture of Ukraine in terms of semantic and cultural understanding. In addition, the investigation will encompass the semantic load of military symbols and traditions, and the determination of their influence on the formation of social norms. The methodology employed is founded upon a comprehensive approach, integrating structural and semantic analyses of the evolution of cultural tradition within the context of the military component and its corresponding identity. Moreover, a comparative method is utilised to discern both the common and unique characteristics of the military tradition within the cultural milieu of Ukraine, in relation to other manifestations of social identity. Additionally, a historical and genetic method is employed to trace the developmental trajectory of the genesis of culture. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematic analysis of the military tradition and military identity in the culture of Ukraine through the prism of the semantic and cultural approach. For the first time, a comprehensive examination of military attributes and rituals as a means of communication and identification, reflecting the worldview and social structures of ancient Ukrainian society, has been carried out. Conclusions. The study’s findings reveal an in-depth analysis of the semantic and symbolic dimension of military tradition and identity in the cultural context of Ukraine. The analysis focuses on the examination of symbolism, signs and rituals that shape the identity of warriors, their position within the socio-cultural space and class hierarchy. The study incorporates a comprehensive analysis of combat attributes, initiation rituals, amulets and other elements of military culture, employing a semantic and ethno-cultural analytical framework. A particular focus was placed on the relationship between military tradition and the spiritual and mythological ideas of the ancient population in Ukraine and the formation of military identity on this basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".