MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409968534 · doi:10.1029/2025gl116574

Frequent Millennial‐Scale Oceanic Redox Oscillations Recorded by Negative Pyrite Δ<sup>33</sup>S: Implications for Phanerozoic Extinctions

2025· article· en· W4409968534 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaoxiao Yu, Mang Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhanerozoicPyriteGeologyRedoxExtinction eventPaleontologyScale (ratio)Earth scienceOceanographyCenozoicMineralogyPhysicsChemistryStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phanerozoic extinctions may have been influenced by oceanic redox oscillations, as indicated by mixing‐induced negative pyrite Δ 33 S (Δ 33 S py ). However, the frequencies, intensities, and timescales of these oscillations remain elusive. Here, we measured stratigraphic Δ 33 S py from the currently anoxic Cariaco Basin, spanning ∼0.6 million years. Our results reveal two distinct patterns of negative Δ 33 S py that are linked to specific redox oscillations, potentially analogous to patterns recorded during Phanerozoic extinctions. During Marine Isotope Stage 1–2 and 9–10, bottom water experienced redox oscillations on a timescale of 10,000 years, resulting in slightly negative Δ 33 S py (−0.03‰). In contrast, during the period of 160–200 kyr BP, bottom water underwent frequent redox oscillations on millennial‐ and centennial‐timescales, leading to significantly more negative Δ 33 S py values (−0.09‰). We highlight that similarly frequent oceanic redox fluctuations may have contributed to the end‐Guadalupian extinction, when notably negative Δ 33 S py values akin to those observed in our study were prevalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→