MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409971382 · doi:10.5376/pgt.2024.15.0009

<i>DEP1</i> and Panicle Architecture: Influencing Rice Yield through Genetic Modulation

2024· article· en· W4409971382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiawei Li, Qiangsheng Qian, Yaodong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Gene and Trait · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanicleYield (engineering)AgronomyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, with the rapid development of molecular biology and genomics, it has become possible to improve rice panicle architecture through gene regulation techniques, thereby enhancing yield. The DEP1  (Dense and Erect Panicle 1) gene, an important gene influencing rice panicle morphology and yield, provides new perspectives and approaches for rice genetic improvement. This study explores the functional mechanisms of the DEP1  gene, elucidates how it regulates rice panicle architecture, and assesses its impact on yield. Through case studies in molecular biology, genomics, and field trials, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the genetic variation, molecular mechanisms, and performance of the DEP1  gene under different environments. The research findings indicate that optimizing the DEP1  gene can significantly improve panicle architecture and increase yield. By unraveling the genetic regulatory network of the DEP1  gene, this study not only contributes to understanding the genetic basis of rice panicle development but also offers new strategies and targets for rice molecular breeding. This is crucial for advancing rice breeding technology and ensuring global food security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Gene and TraitSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207