<i>DEP1</i> and Panicle Architecture: Influencing Rice Yield through Genetic Modulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of molecular biology and genomics, it has become possible to improve rice panicle architecture through gene regulation techniques, thereby enhancing yield. The DEP1 (Dense and Erect Panicle 1) gene, an important gene influencing rice panicle morphology and yield, provides new perspectives and approaches for rice genetic improvement. This study explores the functional mechanisms of the DEP1 gene, elucidates how it regulates rice panicle architecture, and assesses its impact on yield. Through case studies in molecular biology, genomics, and field trials, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the genetic variation, molecular mechanisms, and performance of the DEP1 gene under different environments. The research findings indicate that optimizing the DEP1 gene can significantly improve panicle architecture and increase yield. By unraveling the genetic regulatory network of the DEP1 gene, this study not only contributes to understanding the genetic basis of rice panicle development but also offers new strategies and targets for rice molecular breeding. This is crucial for advancing rice breeding technology and ensuring global food security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".