MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409972932 · doi:10.18280/ts.420242

LSTM-Kalman Filter-Based Multi-Sensor Signal Fusion for UAV Altitude Prediction in Non-Gaussian Environments

2025· article· en· W4409972932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nuo Li, Qiang Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterGaussianComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Sensor fusionArtificial intelligenceFusionExtended Kalman filterEnsemble Kalman filterFast Kalman filterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address altitude estimation inaccuracies in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) under non-Gaussian noise and intermittent sensor failures, this paper proposes a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-Kalman cooperative architecture that establishes symbiotic interaction between deep feature extraction and physical filtering.The core innovation lies in bidirectional cyclic learning: LSTM layers distill temporal noise patterns while Kalman modules inject state-space constraints through differentiable projection.A manifold interpolation mechanism resolves multi-rate signal mismatches, utilizing LSTM-derived coherence weights to guide Lie group synchronization for phase distortion suppression.The framework incorporates a fractal-aware decoupling network where LSTM cells generate adaptive masks, dynamically separating Gaussian/non-Gaussian components to reconstruct Kalman gain rules.Experimental validation demonstrates the architecture's superiority in balancing physical consistency and learning capability, providing a novel paradigm for robust navigation signal fusion under complex noise conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207