MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409979195 · doi:10.1002/minf.202500018

Deep Modeling of Gain‐of‐Function Mutations on Androgen Receptor

2025· article· en· W4409979195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogen receptorProstate cancerMutantComputational biologyMutationAntiandrogensFunction (biology)Computer scienceBiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of Androgen Receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors for prostate cancer (PCa) is on decline due to resistance mechanisms including the occurrence of gain-of-function mutations on human androgen receptor (AR). Hence, understanding and predicting such mutations is crucial for developing effective PCa treatment strategies. Leveraging accu- mulated data on clinically relevant AR mutants with recent advances in deep modeling techniques, this study aims to unveil and quantify critical AR mutation-drug relation- ships. By incorporating molecular descriptors for drugs and mutated genes sequences, this work represented these features as single vectors and demonstrates their effective- ness in modeling AR mutant responses to conventional antiandrogens. The developed approach achieves above 80% accuracy in predicting the gain-of-function behavior of AR mutants and therefore can potentially uncover unknown agonist/antagonist relationships among mutant-drug pairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it