MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409980022 · doi:10.1177/11786329251335877

What Drove Clients’ Decisions to Pause Personal Homecare Services Before and During the Pandemic?

2025· article· en· W4409980022 on OpenAlexaff
Prakathesh Rabeenthira, Katherine Zagrodney, Emily C. King, Kathryn Nichol, Sandra McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Services Insights · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPublic Health OntarioUniversity of OttawaPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyPersonal protective equipmentPersonal careInternet privacyMedicineComputer scienceFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With an increasing reliance on homecare and a scarcity of providers, there is potential to gain insight from existing administrative data to optimize planning and care delivery. To enable more accurate predictions of service use, it is important to understand the degree to which various factors influence clients' difficult decisions to temporarily pause their receipt of necessary homecare services. Objectives: We utilized a large, longitudinal, administrative dataset to examine the relative effects of client-level factors on the outcomes of (1) placing a hold on homecare services and (2) the length of a homecare service hold, through stratified regression analyses separated by pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic periods. Design: Descriptive summaries of the samples consisted of graphical representation and frequencies (proportions) or means. The relationship between client sociodemographic and homecare utilization factors on the service hold initiation and length were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic and linear regression, respectively, stratified by pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic periods. Odds ratios (OR) for hold initiation and exponentiated estimates for hold length were calculated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results: Findings provide a better understanding of the decisions made by a large sample of homecare clients to pause their homecare services in pre-, early-, and mid-pandemic scenarios. Frequency and length of service holds more than doubled in the early-pandemic period; although hold frequencies then returned to pre-pandemic rates, hold durations remained slightly longer. There were notable differences over time, but generally, clients with higher care needs had a reduced likelihood of placing a hold on homecare services. Shorter homecare tenure and previously cancelling individual homecare visits were also good indicators of future service decisions. Conclusion: Findings are relevant for organizations providing homecare services, policymakers, and those interested in predicting homecare utilization for resource allocation planning with the goal of optimal care delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Services InsightsSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207