MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409982220 · doi:10.18280/ts.420211

Fine-Grained Action Understanding in Instructional Sports Videos via a Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Pyramid Network

2025· article· en· W4409982220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Songjiao Wu, Yuan Wang, Liping Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)Action (physics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMultimediaMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the digital transformation of sports education and athletic training, the automated analysis and understanding of instructional sports videos have emerged as critical areas of research.Fine-grained action understanding models play an increasingly significant role in this context, as they are designed to accurately extract and analyze detailed motion information.Traditional approaches to action recognition have primarily relied on singlescale feature extraction, which has proven inadequate for handling complex spatiotemporal information, especially in scenarios characterized by high variability and rapid motion transitions.These limitations often result in reduced accuracy and poor real-time performance.In recent years, multi-scale network models have been explored to enhance video analysis capabilities; however, challenges remain in balancing computational efficiency with precision.To address these shortcomings, a fine-grained action understanding model based on a hierarchical spatiotemporal pyramid network was proposed in this study.By constructing a multi-scale spatiotemporal pyramid prediction algorithm, this model can improve the extraction of spatiotemporal feature points of sports actions.In addition, by incorporating a temporal scale-based fine-grained action prediction algorithm, the model can capture intricate details within instructional sports videos accurately.By optimizing dynamic spatiotemporal characteristics and temporal dependencies, this study achieves improved accuracy and real-time performance in the prediction of fine-grained sports actions, offering a novel theoretical and technical foundation for the development of intelligent sports instruction systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207