The unbearable lightness of servitude: Étienne de la Boétie and the fragility of freedom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asserting human freedom to be innate, Étienne de la Boétie's argument that, in order for tyranny to persist, it must be that people choose servitude is the most famous aspect of his Discourse on Voluntary Servitude . However, alongside our freedom, La Boétie identifies another equally constitutive aspect of the human condition: sociability ( amitié ). Nature sees us yearn equally for both liberty and belonging. Our sociability drives us toward the pro-social pursuits of fairness (if not justice in the fullest political sense) as well as the personal connection that sees us adapting to the customs and norms of our families and communities of birth and upbringing. The “paradox” of voluntary servitude has been cited both by later republicans as inspiration for calls for popular self-rule and by anarchist thinkers who read La Boétie's natural freedom as a radical indictment of all political subjugation. Yet, the careful policing and homogenization of social, linguistic, cultural, and religious life necessary to prevent the fragmentation and individuation that lead to the descent of society into collective servitude is likely the more profound paradox at the heart of La Boétie's thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".