MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409985421 · doi:10.1109/lmwt.2025.3562538

Knowledge-Based Extrapolation of Neural Network Model for Transistor Modeling

2025· article· en· W4409985421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrapolationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceTransistor modelTransistorArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial neural network (ANN) is a useful technique for active device modeling. However, it shows limitations in the extrapolation region. To address this issue, we propose a novel knowledge-based neural network (KBNN) method. The KBNN technique consists of three submodels and their transition mechanisms. One submodel is a pure ANN model which is used for training data region. Two additional submodels are used for the extrapolation region. The proposed method ensures that the output and derivatives of ANN and extrapolation models match at the boundary of the measurement data. This keeps the KBNN model smooth and consistent, making it suitable for transistor design over a broad range. The precision, smoothness, and consistency of the proposed method are verified with a <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2\times 250~\mu $</tex-math> </inline-formula>m GaN HEMT device modeling. The results show that the KBNN model provides physically reasonable predictions over a wide extrapolation region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it