MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409989403 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v45i1.45237

Dante’s Choreographies of Celebration

2025· article· en· W4409989403 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heather Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous episodes in the Commedia present themselves as “scenes,” as interactions between characters that have a highly dramatic quality. These “scenes” would resonate, for medieval audiences, with their personal experiences of live performance events as well as depictions of related scenes in the visual arts that were visible in local churches and baptisteries. This essay takes Dante’s staging of the encounter with Sordello in Purgatorio 6 as a central case study of a scene of celebration with multiple resonances, exploring the ways in which that episode might bring to a reader’s mind visual and textual performances of the Visitation. By contextualizing the scene within relevant medieval modes of performing and viewing affectively powerful scenes, the essay proposes that known scenes of the Visitation might be implicitly employed in Dante’s text to enrich the affective charge of the depiction of the meeting with Sordello.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207