MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409989904 · doi:10.63471/jitmbh24001

Involving Cybersecurity to Protect Small to Medium-Sized Businesses

2024· article· en· W4409989904 on OpenAlexaff
Shuchona Malek Orthi, Mohammad A. Saleh, Md. Mehedi Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Technology Management and Business Horizons · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Canadian institutionsWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityBusinessInternet privacyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk management is a fundamental element for organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to protect their systems and data from cyberattacks. Information technology (IT) is a fundamental requirement for SMEs, providing access to essential services and data sharing. Cybersecurity is crucial for organizations to prevent unauthorized access to data centers and other computerized systems, ensuring a strong security posture against malicious attacks. SMEs should have multiple layers of protection across potential access points, including data, software, hardware, and connected networks. Employees should be trained on compliance and security processes, and tools like unified threat management systems can detect, isolate, and remediate potential threats. Data protection approaches, including data privacy, integrity, and availability, are essential for protecting critical data. Cybersecurity plays a significant role in IT technology issues, involving tools, policies, security concepts, guidelines, risk management approaches, actions, training, best practices, assurance, and technologies. SMEs face various forms of cyberattacks, such as malware, denial of service (DoS) assaults, and phishing, which can cause significant financial losses and damage to their reputation. The purpose of the study is to shed light on the cyberthreats that small and medium-sized enterprises face as well as some preventative measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Information Technology Management and Business HorizonsSame topicCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesFrench-language works237,207