Analyse de l’appropriation de pratiques évaluatives spécifiquement développées pour les élèves vivant avec un trouble du spectre de l’autisme par des enseignants du secondaire au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Évaluer des compétences en adaptation scolaire représente une activité professionnelle complexe. Plus précisément, les enseignants qui travaillent auprès d’élèves ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme éprouvent des difficultés à y parvenir tout en respectant les besoins spécifiques de ces derniers. Notre recherche décrit le processus d’appropriation de pratiques évaluatives de trois personnes enseignantes du secondaire à travers des études de cas qui permettent de présenter des exemples concrets d’actions posées pendant le processus. Les résultats montrent que le changement de pratiques et de vision de l’évaluation est un processus dynamique qui se forge avec le temps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".