MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409990997 · doi:10.1109/lmwt.2025.3563499

Compact Dual-Band Filters Using Single-Cavity SIW and Quarter-Wavelength Stripline Resonators

2025· article· en· W4409990997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chun Feng Fan, Sen Sen, Qing Liu, Yan Zhang, Qingfeng Zhang, Ke Gong, Yufang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Department of Henan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStriplineResonatorMulti-band deviceOptoelectronicsQuarter (Canadian coin)WavelengthMaterials scienceOpticsDual (grammatical number)Band-pass filterElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter proposes novel dual-band filters utilizing a universal hybrid structure that combines substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) and quarter-wavelength stripline resonators (QWSLRs). By integrating a single-cavity SIW and different numbers of QWSLRs, two highly compact dual-band filters with large frequency ratios are presented. The dual-band response is achieved in the single-cavity SIW through the interaction of the fundamental mode and higher order modes of the SIW cavity, along with the fundamental modes of QWSLRs. Four metallic vias are introduced as perturbations to achieve more flexible responses. Two hybrid dual-band filters are fabricated for validation. These filters not only maintain the superiority of SIW but also achieve a size reduction exceeding 50% compared to conventional SIW filters of the same order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207