MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of Newly Measured <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> </mml:math> -Delayed Neutron Emitters around <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Ni</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>78</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> on Light Element Nucleosynthesis in the Neutrino Wind Following a Neutron Star Merger

2025· article· en· W4409992713 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Tolosa-Delgado, J. L. Taı́n, Moritz Reichert, Almudena Arcones, Marius Eichler, B. C. Rasco, N. T. Brewer, K. P. Rykaczewski, R. Yokoyama, R. Grzywacz, I. Dillmann, J. Agramunt, D. S. Ahn, A. Algora, H. Baba, S. Bae, C. G. Bruno, R. Caballero-Folch, F. Calviño, P. J. Coleman-Smith, G. Cortés, T. Davinson, C. Domingo‐Pardo, A. Estradé, N. Fukuda, S. Go, C. J. Griffin, J. Ha, O. Hall, L. J. Harkness-Brennan, T. Isobe, D. Kahl, M. Karny, L. H. Khiem, G. G. Kiss, M. Kogimtzis, A. Korgul, S. Kubono, M. Labiche, I. Lazarus, J. F. Liang, J. Lee, J. Liu, G. Lorusso, Kazunori Matsui, K. Miernik, F. Montes, B. Moon, A. I. Morales, N. Nepal, S. Nishimura, R. D. Page, M. Piersa-Siłkowska, V. H. Phong, Zs. Podolyák, V. Pucknell, P. H. Regan, B. Rubio, Y. Saito, H. Sakuraï, Y. Shimizu, J. Simpson, P.-A. Söderström, D. W. Stracener, T. Sumikama, Rebecca Surman, H. Suzuki, M. Takechi, H. Takeda, A. Tarifeño-Saldivia, S.L. Thomas, M. Wolińska-Cichocka, P. J. Woods, X. X. Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersNextGenerationEUDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHigh Energy PhysicsAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónRIKENNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalInstitute for Basic ScienceEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOak Ridge National LaboratoryMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadAcademy of FinlandGeneralitat ValencianaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationEuropean Regional Development FundU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean Social FundNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinisterul Cercetării, Inovării şi DigitalizăriiMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron emission probabilities and half-lives of 37 β-delayed neutron emitters from ^{75}Ni to ^{92}Br were measured at the RIKEN Nishina Center in Japan, including 11 one-neutron and 13 two-neutron emission probabilities and six half-lives for the first time that supersede theoretical estimates. These nuclei lie in the path of the weak r process occurring in neutrino-driven winds from the accretion disk formed after the merger of two neutron stars synthesizing elements in the A∼80 abundance peak. The presence of such elements dominates the accompanying kilonova emission over the first few days and have been identified in the AT2017gfo event, associated to the gravitational wave detection GW170817. Abundance calculations based on over 17 000 simulated trajectories describing the evolution of matter properties in the merger outflows show that the new data lead to an increase of 50%-70% in the abundance of Y, Zr, Nb, and Mo. This enhancement is large compared to the scatter of relative abundances observed in old very metal poor stars and thus is significant in the comparison with other possible astrophysical processes contributing to the light-element production. These results underline the importance of including experimental decay data for very neutron-rich β-delayed neutron emitters into r-process models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review Letters→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→