MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’immigration, un enjeu municipal au Québec ?

2025· article· fr· W4409993135 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Carpentier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Possibles · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les municipalités québécoises jouent un rôle crucial, mais souvent sous-estimé, dans l’accueil, l’insertion et l’inclusion des personnes immigrantes et des minorités ethnoculturelles. Ce texte examine l’intervention croissante des municipalités dans ces domaines en répondant à quatre questions clés: pourquoi leur rôle mérite-t-il une attention particulière, quelles sont leurs responsabilités, quelles actions concrètes mènent-elles et quels défis rencontrent-elles? Face au transfert de responsabilités du gouvernement provincial et à l’urgence de répondre aux besoins locaux, plusieurs villes ont adopté des approches structurées pour bâtir des collectivités ouvertes et inclusives. Dans ce contexte, elles doivent concilier leur autonomie limitée avec les contraintes institutionnelles pour surmonter les défis liés à l’immigration. Loin d’être de simples exécutantes ou des relais du provincial, les municipalités doivent être reconnues de facto comme de véritables gouvernements de proximité, avec un potentiel encore à exploiter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue PossiblesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207