Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les municipalités québécoises jouent un rôle crucial, mais souvent sous-estimé, dans l’accueil, l’insertion et l’inclusion des personnes immigrantes et des minorités ethnoculturelles. Ce texte examine l’intervention croissante des municipalités dans ces domaines en répondant à quatre questions clés: pourquoi leur rôle mérite-t-il une attention particulière, quelles sont leurs responsabilités, quelles actions concrètes mènent-elles et quels défis rencontrent-elles? Face au transfert de responsabilités du gouvernement provincial et à l’urgence de répondre aux besoins locaux, plusieurs villes ont adopté des approches structurées pour bâtir des collectivités ouvertes et inclusives. Dans ce contexte, elles doivent concilier leur autonomie limitée avec les contraintes institutionnelles pour surmonter les défis liés à l’immigration. Loin d’être de simples exécutantes ou des relais du provincial, les municipalités doivent être reconnues de facto comme de véritables gouvernements de proximité, avec un potentiel encore à exploiter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".