Low T cell diversity associates with poor outcome in bladder cancer: A comprehensive longitudinal analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T cells are crucial effector cells in the endogenous defense against cancer, yet the clinical impact of their quantity, diversity, and dynamics remains underexplored. Here, we investigate the clinical relevance of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in patients with bladder cancer. In advanced-stage disease, low pre-treatment peripheral TCR diversity is associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.024), particularly when coupled with low circulating T cell fractions (p = 0.00049). These low-diversity repertoires are dominated by hyper-expanded clones that persist throughout treatment. Further longitudinal analysis reveals reductions in TCR diversity after treatment, indicating adverse effects on the immune system. In early-stage disease, immunotherapy increases TCR diversity in patients with good outcomes. Furthermore, single-cell sequencing identifies most hyper-expanded clones as cytotoxic T cells, while non-expanded clones are predominantly naive T cells. Overall, this highlights TCR diversity as a promising biomarker, offering opportunities for tailored oncological treatments to enhance clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".