Rancang Bangun Sistem Monitoring Emisi Gas Buang Pada Ruang Parkir Bawah Tanah Gedung Perkantoran Menggunakan Internet of Things (IoT)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang dan membangun sistem monitoring emisi gas buang di ruang parkir bawah tanah gedung perkantoran dengan memanfaatkan teknologi Internet of Things (IoT). Sistem ini mengintegrasikan sensor MQ-7 dan MQ-135 untuk mendeteksi gas berbahaya seperti karbon monoksida (CO), sulfur dioksida (SO₂), dan nitrogen oksida (NOₓ). Data hasil deteksi dikirim secara real-time melalui modul ESP32 ke aplikasi Blynk, sehingga memungkinkan pemantauan kualitas udara secara terus-menerus dan jarak jauh. Selain itu, sistem ini juga dilengkapi dengan indikator visual berupa LED dan buzzer sebagai peringatan dini apabila konsentrasi gas melebihi ambang batas yang ditentukan. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa sistem ini mampu mendeteksi dan memantau emisi gas secara akurat serta memberikan notifikasi yang dapat digunakan sebagai dasar pengambilan tindakan preventif. Dengan demikian, sistem ini dinilai efektif dan andal dalam menjaga kualitas udara di area parkir tertutup. Kesimpulannya, implementasi sistem monitoring berbasis IoT ini berpotensi besar untuk meningkatkan keselamatan dan kesehatan pengguna ruang parkir bawah tanah melalui pemantauan kualitas udara yang efisien, real-time, dan responsif terhadap kondisi lingkungan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it