MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409999312 · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2025.118284

New microextraction techniques in exposome Research: Bridging environmental exposures and human health

2025· article· en· W4409999312 on OpenAlexafffund
Hasan Javanmardi, Anna Roszkowska, Janusz Pawliszyn

Bibliographic record

VenueTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExposomeBridging (networking)Human healthEnvironmental healthNanotechnologyData scienceMedicineComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposome studies encompass comprehensive investigations into the various exposures individual living organisms encounter from exogenous factors throughout their lifetime, and how these exposures may affect their health status. These studies may focus on health risks associated with single chemical exposures or the cumulative effect of multiple chemicals, aiming to elucidate dose−response relationships. Numerous analytical methods are available for measuring contaminants and/or their endogenous metabolites across various matrices, including biofluids, food, air, water, and soil. In recent years, microextraction techniques have gained increasing relevance in exposome research due to their ability to enhance analytical throughput while minimizing invasion to the systems under study. Among these techniques, solid phase microextraction (SPME), a well-established sample preparation method in environmental and toxicological studies, has gained particular attention for its ability to extract a wide range of compounds, including short-lived and unstable compounds, directly from living organisms ( in vivo SPME). As a result, SPME is gaining traction in exposome studies for its ability to both detect exogenous compounds in environmental matrices and track the fate of these contaminants, including their metabolism, accumulation, and metabolic effects in living systems. This review explores recent applications of microextraction in exposome research, highlighting the advantages of different coatings, adsorbent chemistries, and geometric designs— such as fiber SPME, thin film SPME (TFME), needle trap devices (NTDs), coated tips (arrow-SPME), blade SPME, and the newly introduced swab-SPME—for the analysis of exogenous and endogenous compounds in environmental samples and in biological matrices. We also examine the emerging applications of direct-MS coupled with SPME in exposome research and provide an overview of the significant potential of SPME in both targeted and untargeted screening of low molecular weight molecules within exposomics and metabolomics applications. • Microextraction advances enable exposome and biological effect analysis. • SPME allows non-lethal in vivo sampling in diverse exposome matrices. • Needle trap Devices (NTDs) excel in breath/air analysis for exposome research. • SPME-direct-MS integration enables rapid environmental exposure screening. • SPME & NTD monitor free/particle-bound pollutants in real samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrAC Trends in Analytical ChemistrySame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207