MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410001478 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2024-0280

Evaluation of <i>Cryptomeria japonica</i> forest management based on wood production and carbon emission reduction in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan

2025· article· en· W4410001478 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hayato Kamei, Tohru Nakajima, Kun Pu, Satoshi Tatsuhara

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTelecommunications Advancement Foundation
KeywordsCryptomeriaJaponicaForestryEnvironmental scienceForest managementCarbon fibersAgroforestryGeographyBotanyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With respect to carbon emissions in the context of climate change, a trade-off occurs between the carbon fixation and timber production functions of forests. Through this study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between the two functions by comparing harvesting plans for maximising timber production and carbon emission reduction effects at a privately owned sugi ( Cryptomeria japonica) forest in Tsuruoka City, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. When formulating the harvesting plans, we included unreforested clearcuts as an option and assumed the natural regeneration of broadleaf forests in unreforested clearcuts. Reduction of carbon emission effects was evaluated based on carbon stocks in forest biomass, harvested wood products, and substitution effects, which we evaluated using static and dynamic substitution effect approaches. The results showed that even when the dynamic substitution effect was used, no trade-off occurred between timber production and carbon emission reduction until 2050; however, a trade-off was impending in the long run. This result supports Japan’s timber utilisation promotion policy to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest Research→Same topicForest ecology and management→French-language works237,207→