Joseph-Pierre de Bonnécamps: A Jesuit Scientist Living in Turbulent Times
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joseph-Pierre de Bonnécamps, S.J. (1707–90), was a Jesuit scientist, educator, and hydrographer whose career intersected with key events in 18th-century French colonial history. Trained in mathematics and hydrography, he taught at the Jesuit College in Quebec (1744–59) and participated in the 1749 Céloron expedition, documenting geographic, botanical, and cultural observations in his journal. His meticulous measurements and maps contributed to French strategic efforts in North America. Following the fall of Quebec in 1759 and the suppression of the Jesuits in France, Bonnécamps returned to pastoral work, including a controversial assignment in Saint-Pierre. Ultimately, he spent his later years as a tutor and scientific observer in Brittany. His life offers insight into the roles Jesuits played as educators, scientists, and intermediaries between military, political, and Indigenous communities. This study reexamines Bonnécamps’s contributions, situating him within the broader scientific and geopolitical transformations of his time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".