MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410004625 · doi:10.26034/roadsides-202501303

Remediating Trails.

2025· article· en· W4410004625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Goyhenex

Bibliographic record

VenueRoadsides · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Transportation Route is an ongoing remediation project conducted by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories that aims to clean up contaminations of water and land trails from transportation of pitchblende (a radioactive, uranium-rich mineral) on between the 1930s and 1960s in the Northwest Territories and Alberta, Canada. Parallel to this project, a Dene First Nation (Alberta, Canada) is leading its own community-based environmental monitoring to verify and assess past reports on contamination on its reserves. The portage trails along which pitchblende was transported hold a special place in the region, as crucial land trails connecting river routes. These traditional land routes were appropriated by companies and governments to support industrial and imperialist projects. Expansion of the fur trade, mining rush and the development of settler state transformed Indigenous land and water trails to support the transportation of extracted resources from the North to the South. In this paper, I examine the intersections and superpositions of Indigenous and imperial/ industrial transportation infrastructure. How did Indigenous infrastructures get enmeshed into industrial and imperial project and become toxic? How are these relations remembered and re-negotiated by inhabitants around those toxicities? What does it mean to remediate toxicities for local Dene communities? I consider portage trails, part of Indigenous infrastructures built on close relations between humans and non-humans, within the larger history of land appropriation and contamination by colonial projects with their toxic infrastructures of expansion (Armstrong et al., 2023). Following Cowen's division of infrastructure anchored in ontologies of supply (by state) and care (by Indigenous people) (in Pasternak et al., 2023), I examine the contaminated portage trails as coexisting, entangled infrastructures of care and toxicity, and the spilled uranium-ore as part of the expected failures and violence of infrastructure of transportation (Spice, 2018) affecting local Indigenous communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoadsidesSame topicEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesFrench-language works237,207