Estimating Soil Attributes for Yield Gap Reduction in Africa Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data with Artificial Intelligence Methods: An Extensive Review and Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Africa’s rapidly growing population is driving unprecedented demands on agricultural production systems. However, agricultural yields in Africa are far below their potential. One of the challenges leading to low productivity is Africa‘s poor soil quality. Effective soil fertility management is an essential key factor for optimizing agricultural productivity while ensuring environmental sustainability. Key soil fertility properties—such as soil organic carbon (SOC), nutrient levels (i.e., nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), moisture retention (MR) or moisture content (MC), and soil texture (clay, sand, and loam fractions)—are critical factors influencing crop yield. In this context, this study conducts an extensive literature review on the use of hyperspectral remote sensing technologies, with a particular focus on freely accessible hyperspectral remote sensing data (e.g., PRISMA, EnMAP), as well as an evaluation of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) models for analyzing and processing spectral data to map soil attributes. More specifically, the study examined progress in applying hyperspectral remote sensing technologies for monitoring and mapping soil properties in Africa over the last 15 years (2008–2024). Our results demonstrated that (i) only very few studies have explored high-resolution remote sensing sensors (i.e., hyperspectral satellite sensors) for soil property mapping in Africa; (ii) there is a considerable value in AI approaches for estimating and mapping soil attributes, with a strong recommendation to further explore the potential of deep learning techniques; (iii) despite advancements in AI-based methodologies and the availability of hyperspectral sensors, their combined application remains underexplored in the African context. To our knowledge, no studies have yet integrated these technologies for soil property mapping in Africa. This review also highlights the potential of adopting hyperspectral data (i.e., encompassing both imaging and spectroscopy) integrated with advanced AI models to enhance the accurate mapping of soil fertility properties in Africa, thereby constituting a base for addressing the question of yield gap.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".