MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410005122 · doi:10.3390/rs17091597

Estimating Soil Attributes for Yield Gap Reduction in Africa Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data with Artificial Intelligence Methods: An Extensive Review and Synthesis

2025· article· en· W4410005122 on OpenAlexaff
Nadir Elbouanani, Ahmed Laamrani, Hicham Hajji, Mohamed Bourriz, François Bourzeix, Hamd Ait Abdelali, A. El-Battay, Abdelhakim Amazirh, Abdelghani Chehbouni

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersFondation OCPUniversité Mohammed VI Polytechnique
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingRemote sensingYield (engineering)Environmental scienceReduction (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMaterials scienceGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Africa’s rapidly growing population is driving unprecedented demands on agricultural production systems. However, agricultural yields in Africa are far below their potential. One of the challenges leading to low productivity is Africa‘s poor soil quality. Effective soil fertility management is an essential key factor for optimizing agricultural productivity while ensuring environmental sustainability. Key soil fertility properties—such as soil organic carbon (SOC), nutrient levels (i.e., nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), moisture retention (MR) or moisture content (MC), and soil texture (clay, sand, and loam fractions)—are critical factors influencing crop yield. In this context, this study conducts an extensive literature review on the use of hyperspectral remote sensing technologies, with a particular focus on freely accessible hyperspectral remote sensing data (e.g., PRISMA, EnMAP), as well as an evaluation of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) models for analyzing and processing spectral data to map soil attributes. More specifically, the study examined progress in applying hyperspectral remote sensing technologies for monitoring and mapping soil properties in Africa over the last 15 years (2008–2024). Our results demonstrated that (i) only very few studies have explored high-resolution remote sensing sensors (i.e., hyperspectral satellite sensors) for soil property mapping in Africa; (ii) there is a considerable value in AI approaches for estimating and mapping soil attributes, with a strong recommendation to further explore the potential of deep learning techniques; (iii) despite advancements in AI-based methodologies and the availability of hyperspectral sensors, their combined application remains underexplored in the African context. To our knowledge, no studies have yet integrated these technologies for soil property mapping in Africa. This review also highlights the potential of adopting hyperspectral data (i.e., encompassing both imaging and spectroscopy) integrated with advanced AI models to enhance the accurate mapping of soil fertility properties in Africa, thereby constituting a base for addressing the question of yield gap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207