MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410014203 · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101007

Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in patients with severe COVID-19 neurological outcomes and Alzheimer’s disease

2025· article· en· W4410014203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior & Immunity - Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroMinistério da SaúdeCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Cerebrospinal fluidMedicineDiseaseSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: COVID-19 induces acute and long-term neurological symptoms. Links between COVID-19 neurological disturbance and Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been hypothesized because neuroinflammation plays a significant role in both diseases. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 patients with neurological disturbance present molecular alterations related to AD pathology. A better understanding of possible molecular links between COVID-19-induced neurological disease and AD would lead to improved patient follow-up and late-onset disease prevention. Here, we analyze early AD biomarkers in a Brazilian cohort of COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. We compared COVID-19 patients' neuroinflammatory and AD biomarker levels to controls, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and AD. Methods: We analyzed cerebrospinal (CSF) biomarkers of neuroinflammation (interleukin-6 (IL6)), amyloid-beta (Aβ) proteinopathy (Aβ42/40), phosphorylated Tau (pTau181), and the neurodegeneration-associated biomarker total Tau in controls (n = 36), COVID-19 patients presenting neurological alterations (n = 35), aMCI (n = 19), and AD patients (n = 20). Comparisons were corrected by possible sex, age, and comorbidities confounding effects. CSF biomarkers were correlated with systemic and neuro-inflammation markers. Results: We found that severe COVID-19 patients presented higher CSF Tau than controls, comparable to alterations observed in AD patients. However, we did not find changes in CSF Aβ42/40, pTau-181/Aβ42, or Tau/Aβ42 ratios. Severe COVID-19 patients presented higher Tau, Tau/Aβ42, and pTau181/Aβ42 than mild patients. In COVID-19 patients, CSF pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 and AD biomarkers correlated with systemic inflammatory index (SII). Conclusions: Collectively, our findings reveal that CSF tau levels are comparably elevated in COVID-19 neurological patients and AD, suggesting ongoing neurodegeneration in COVID-19 neurological disease, but no biomarker alterations related to AD pathology. Furthermore, CNS AD-related biomarker levels in COVID-19 patients change in association with disease severity and systemic inflammation. Considering that inflammation may persist post-COVID, our findings urge the assessment of possible AD-related biomarker changes in COVID-19 survivors with lingering symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it