MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410014687 · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2025.02.009

Persistent Fibrosis and Left Ventricular Chamber Stiffening Despite Cessation of Repetitive Pressure Overload in Swine

2025· article· en· W4410014687 on OpenAlexaff
Brian R. Weil, Luke Graser, Sailee Rasam, Henry Zimmer, Filip Konečný, George Techiryan, Charlotte Starling, Jun Qu, John M. Canty

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Basic to Translational Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesAmerican Heart AssociationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyFibrosisPressure overloadInternal medicineStiffeningVentricular pressureHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine whether repetitive pressure overload-induced left ventricular (LV) fibrosis and LV chamber stiffening are reversible upon normalization of hemodynamics, swine were subjected to 2 weeks of daily phenylephrine (2 h/d) followed by a 2-week or 4-week recovery period. Despite cessation of repetitive pressure overload, interstitial fibrosis persisted, and LV chamber stiffness remained increased for up to 4 weeks of recovery. The persistent increase in LV chamber stiffness was accompanied by dynamic changes in extracellular matrix protein expression. The rapid and persistent increase in LV chamber stiffness may explain how hypertrophy-independent LV stiffening develops in the absence of sustained hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Basic to Translational ScienceSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207