MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410015582 · doi:10.1145/3733892.3733894

Securing Bluetooth Across Layers: A Systematic Review of Protection Strategies

2025· review· en· W4410015582 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluetoothComputer scienceComputer securityBusinessEnvironmental scienceTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Named after the Viking King Harald Bluetooth, Bluetooth is the de facto standard for short-range wireless communications. The introduction of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and Mesh protocols has further paved the way for its domination in the era of IoT. Meanwhile, attacks against Bluetooth, such as BlueBorne [1] and BLESA [2], have been booming in the past few years, impacting billions of devices. Thus, in this paper, we summarize a systematization-of-knowledge paper [3] focusing on the diverse experimental methods in Bluetooth vulnerability identification and prevention to shed some light on the landscape of this research domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it